Compare

Compare loops, not logos

Three honest alternative pages — Jobscan, Teal, Huntr. Not a versus farm and not a job board.

Compare loops, not keyword dumps

People search “Jobscan alternative” or “Teal vs Huntr” when a score or a kanban stopped being enough. This hub exists for that question. It is not a resume-builder landing, not a job board, and not a farm of thin versus pages for every logo we can spell.

Resume.win is one finished Apply Kit per job: paste a live description, tailor, ATS-check, write a cover from that same JD, mark Applied, then log the outcome. The tracker is the CRM after Applied. Interview Pro mocks the posting you already submitted. We do not invent reply rates.

Jobscan is a fit-score product. Teal and Huntr are trackers with adjacent writing tools. Those are real jobs. Ours is different: the score is a step, not the product. If you only want a scan, stay on /ats-checker. If you want the week after you apply, stay here and open the matching comparison.

We publish three pages. We will not add a fourth competitor URL because the sitemap has room. Rank these for alternative intent. Rank /ats-checker, /job-tracker, and /apply-kit for their own queries.

Which comparison to open

Open the Jobscan page if you already live in ATS percentages and want to know what happens after the scan. We run a free keyword-fit teaser against one JD. Saving it as a kit and finishing tailor → cover → Applied is the loop Jobscan does not own.

Open the Teal page if you want a Chrome-plus-tracker suite and you are tired of a board that fills up with drafts you never submitted. Our extension captures a posting into Apply Kit. It does not scrape a feed. The tracker starts after Applied.

Open the Huntr page if you want a pipeline CRM and you keep losing the version you sent. We hold the kit on the same job you pasted. Follow-up dates and silence live there. A kanban without a finished application is a spreadsheet that lies.

Do not read all three as homework. Pick the tool you already pay for — or the query that brought you — then finish one kit on a live posting. About and Trust stay entity pages. This hub does not absorb them.

What these pages will not claim

We will not say we “beat” another company’s parser. ATS implementations differ. A high fit score here is coverage against one pasted JD, not a secret bypass and not a screen.

We will not promise interviews, placements, or a marketplace of openings. You bring the posting from LinkedIn, Indeed, or a careers page. Employers decide who gets a reply.

We will not treat coaches, career centers, or the extension as resume-builder landings. Those URLs stay conversion and partnership pages. Comparison copy points at them only when the intent matches.

Public proof totals stay hidden until there are enough finished kits and logged outcomes. Hidden numbers are more honest than a trophy wall next to a competitor logo.

FAQ

Is this a directory of every resume tool?
No. Three comparisons: Jobscan (score vs kit), Teal (suite vs kit-then-tracker), Huntr (pipeline vs outcomes after Applied). We will not add more versus URLs until these earn impressions.
Should I start on /compare or on Apply Kit?
If you already have a live JD and you want to apply, start on /apply-kit. Use this hub when you are choosing a tool, not when you are finishing a posting.
Do you list jobs like a board those tools might include?
No. Resume.win does not list openings. Inventory stays “bring your JD.” Comparison pages that pretend we are a board would be a lie.
Will you publish fake interview rates next to a competitor?
No. Proof is a logged outcome on a version you sent. Public aggregates wait for volume. See /proof.